ChainReviewMethodology
ChainReview uses explicit scoring inputs, source notes, calculator assumptions, and advertising separation so readers can see how a conclusion was reached.
ChainReview scores tokens by observable risk inputs rather than price predictions. A higher score means fewer unresolved diligence questions, not a buy signal.
Mining pages use sensitivity math so readers can change power rate, hashprice, uptime, fees, and hardware cost instead of relying on a single rosy scenario.
Presale coverage separates marketing mechanics from evidence. Stage prices, bonuses, and referral flows are treated as promotional context, not proof of quality.
Safety guidance focuses on practical failure modes: wrong network transfers, malicious approvals, fake support, exchange withdrawal controls, and backup mistakes.
Sponsored placements and affiliate links must be labeled. Methodology, safety, glossary, source, and calculator pages are designed to explain assumptions and risk checks before any reader takes action.
Read editorial policyEstimate daily gross revenue, electricity cost, breakeven hashprice, heat output, and simple hardware payback.
Interactive toolDiligenceScore liquidity, holders, unlocks, code control, team transparency, and narrative pressure before comparing a token.
Interactive toolPortfolioSize positions around downside, stop discipline, drawdown recovery, and monthly DCA assumptions.
Interactive toolSourcesA readable source index showing how official references, hardware specs, tax pages, and market data are used across the site.
Research indexToolsDownloadable checklists for presales, token risk, mining ROI, tax recordkeeping, and exchange withdrawals.
Reader worksheetsChainReview separates sponsored placements from editorial analysis. Crypto assets, mining operations, and presales are risky, and all coverage is informational only.